The item beside this text is an advertisement

QUILLBLOG

Filed under: Quillblog,

Related posts

No related posts.

U.S. writers’ groups team up to protest Google settlement

With the Jan. 28 opt-out deadline fast approaching, three major U.S. writers’ groups – The National Writers Union, The American Society of Journalists and Authors, and the Science Fiction Writers of America – have sent a joint letter to more than 60 members of Congress condemning the recently amended Google Book Search settlement proposal. It’s a notable break with the Authors Guild and the Association of American Publishers, both of which are working with Google on the settlement.

The three dissenting organizations seem to be specifically targeting Congressmen who are authors themselves. From the letter:

The ramifications of the amended settlement for any one author and any one book are exceptionally complex. We’ve talked to our members, authors like yourself. The ones who got the notice found it incomprehensible and just shook their heads in confusion. Go to the settlement website’s poorly implemented database and see for yourself how tricky this is – has your book been scanned? Is it commercially available?  Should you opt out? If you do nothing, you’re automatically included in the settlement. If you opt out, Google doesn’t even guarantee that it won’t steal your work in the future.

It isn’t fair.  There are millions of book authors in this country who could be locked into an agreement they don’t understand and didn’t ask for. The Authors Guild represents only a tiny fraction of published writers, yet the new regulatory board set up in the proposed settlement will override individual book contracts – not to mention common law and even the Constitutional protection of copyright. Mary Beth Peters, Register of Copyrights, testified before the House Judiciary Committee that the settlement would “turn copyright on its head.” Nothing in the revised U.S.settlement changes that.

  • William Corsa

    Google illegally scanned an enormous number of copyright works. The law suits brought against them were for copyright infringement. How does the litigation of specific copyright infringements turn into a class action settlement giving Google benefits and a giant step toward control of the digital future of publishing? I realize the settlement talks were well intentioned, but they’ve gone wrong and will destroy copyright in the 21st century. What happened to asking permission of the copyright holder? Why reward the thief?

  • L. Bracken

    As an author and publishser I am not at all surprised this action has been taken to reward a massive money-making enterprise while pillaging from the pockets of typically already struggling authors. It’s how the rich get richer, and in America, this is increasingly how its done… back-door deals with policy makers afraid of offending corporate giants. There is a limit in our modern culture to the heady joys of “FREE”. Someone has to sacrifice to create the materials copied and distributed. Not everything is plagiarized and emulated. To lift original work under copyright protections in the interest of furthering public domain will do nothing but dilute the intellectual contributions necessary to maintaining an already dangerously faltering literate culture.

The item directly under this text is an advertisement
Books of the year
Click to see Books of the Year 2011 package Click to see Books of the Year 2010 package Click to see Books of the Year 2009 package
Most shared stories this week
Book Pictures

Do you have great photos from a recent book event in Canada that you'd like to share with us? Submit them to the Quill & Quire Flickr pool and they'll show up here.

a congrats to all

Rage

Jenna Tenn-Yuk

breaktime interviewing

interviewing

Danielle K.L. Gregoire

Sepideh

Elle P

sound poetry

Anita

Frances

winning

Recent comments