If publishers were nervous about the future of the industry before, they’ve gotta be outright terrified now. Over the past few days, some of the most time-honoured practices of the business have been challenged or assaulted, and Amazon is leading the charge.
Late last week, the competition in the U.S. to offer the cheapest prices on e-books reached a new low with both Amazon and Barnes & Noble offering selected new titles for a mere $7.99. Though online retailers are absorbing the losses at the moment, there’s a strong possibility that the burden could shift to publishers. More important, however, is the fact that Amazon and its ilk have effectively shut publishers out of e-book pricing decisions altogether.
An equally pressing topic, meanwhile, is the question of who owns e-book rights to backlist titles. Since the vast majority of old author contracts contain no stipulations about e-book rights, authors and agents are awakening to the possibility of shopping those rights to firms other than the ones that publish the hard copies. Simon & Schuster found this out the hard way earlier this week when one of its authors, Stephen Covey, signed a deal with Amazon for exclusive digital rights to his perennial bestseller The 7 Habits of Highly Effective People. The move, which essentially cuts publishers out of the process altogether, is likely to catch on with a lot of other big-name authors if it goes unchallenged.
Clearly alarmed by what’s been happening, Random House took the ill-advised move of informing agents and authors that it retains exclusive digital rights to the vast majority of its backlist titles – a highly debatable assertion, and one that came off more like a threat than a friendly reminder.
According to a report in the Guardian today, however, Random House may not have a leg to stand on. The article points out that in 2002 Random House failed in an attempt to block e-book company RosettaBooks from selling digital versions of several of its backlist titles:
The ruling, upheld on appeal, found that copyright for books that were written before digital publishing existed remained with the author.
Arthur Klebanoff, head of RosettaBooks, secured Covey’s exclusive deal this week with Amazon. He said: “We are very clear about this, the author controls the rights unless it is specified otherwise, and that was settled by the courts years ago.”
Simon & Schuster, which took a knock over the Covey deal, was taking a softer stance than Random House but not accepting defeat. Adam Rothberg, a spokesman, would not comment on Covey specifically, but said in general terms it was the company’s “intention to publish the electronic editions to our backlist titles.”
- » Random House asserts ownership of e-rights to old titles
- » Why your e-books should be free … even though Dan Brown’s aren’t
- » Bookmarks: E-books, Nooks, and poetry (or, one of these things is not like the others)
- » Google unveils plans to sell e-books
- » British Library to offer free downloads of public domain books
“The ruling, upheld on appeal, found that copyright for books that were written before digital publishing existed remained with the author.”
Presumably this is an inaccurate rendering of the ruling. Copyright always rests with the author, unless the author has outright sold the copyright, which is unusual except in freelancing. What they presumably mean to say is that electronic publishing rights remained with the author.
As to the trend cutting “publishers out of the process”, it would be more accurate to say that new electronic publishers are arising – Amazon, and Google for example. These companies are setting themselves up as gigantic international publishers and are shutting other publishers (who mainly deal in print) out of the electronic publishing game.
NEIN! NEIN! NEIN! NEIN! NEIN! NEIN! NEIN! NEIN! NEIN! NEIN! NEIN! NEIN! NEIN! NEIN!
It think it’s means “rights” rather than “copyright”. Only scammers and the ignorant asked to buy copyright. The point still stands though: any rights other than those explicitly sold to the publisher remain with the author. Unfortunately, RH is so big that it can afford to sue people into silence over the issue; Rosetta was forced to settle with them before they ran out of money. The trade publishers aren’t exsactly rolling in it these days, but they can afford suits like this without bankrupting themselves, which is more than the e-startups can. I’m sure they’d argue they can’t afford not to without risk of bankrupting themselves!
Random House does not own any rights unless the author signs them away, and only in the publishing contract. If RH sues, it will only damage its reputation as a credible publisher. Browbeating an author and his choice of epublisher into submission is going to accomplish that even more, and any judge worth his salt will dismiss the suit as frivolous. US copyright rules state that the author of “the work” retains all copyrights in ANY form until 70 years after his death or his estate releases them to a third party. It does not distinguish between books and ebooks. Therefore, RH is wrong to appeal something which has been understood clearly for the last decade. It will lose.
[...] War over e-books heats up…Amazon and its ilk have effectively shut publishers out of e-book pricing decisions altogether. Ilk=booksellers. [...]
E-books will be $5.99 soon, and $2.99 within two years. The only people who will be making any money on digital ‘content’ will be those who make and sell the devices. Apple’s already established the paradigm, folks.
[...] to Rogers: most publishers are terrified of the digital future – and not always without reason. And booksellers? They could be rendered obsolete if gadgets like the Tablet truly take off. Just [...]