Google backs away from public debate over Book Search settlement

QUILLBLOG

By Scott MacDonald
November 18, 2009
1:53 PM

Filed under: Industry news, Google Book Search, NewsHour with Jim Lehrer

No related posts.

Now that Google has amended its proposed Book Search settlement and made numerous concessions to its critics, you’d think it might be more open to publicly discussing the settlement. According to the San Francisco Chronicle, however, the corporate giant pulled out of a chance to “publicly wrangle” with the Open Book Alliance on an episode of The NewsHour with Jim Lehrer last Monday.

Google Books engineering director Dan Clancy had agreed to appear on The NewsHour with Jim Lehrer to debate the topic with Harvard professor Robert Darnton. With little notice, however, Silicon Valley attorney Gary Reback was added to the line up.

Reback spearheaded the antitrust crusade against Microsoft last decade and, by the way, co-chairs the Open Books Alliance, whose members include Google competitors Yahoo, Microsoft, and Amazon.com.

Apparently Google didn’t want an engineer to spar with a lawyer on national television.

Paul

>Apparently Google didn’t want an engineer to spar with a >lawyer on national television

It’s a bit late for Google to suddenly realize that what is technologically feasible isn’t necessarily ethical or legal.
http://www.facebook.com/douglas.fevens Douglas Fevens

I’ve been Googleized and I think the Canadian government should hold an inquiry into the Google Books project and settlement to ensure that Canada’s rights under the Berne Convention and the copyright provisions of the North American Free Trade Agreement have not/will not be violated.
Douglas Fevens,
Halifax, Nova Scotia

Latest issue: January-February 2012

Books of the year

Click to see Books of the Year 2009 package

Book Pictures

Do you have great photos from a recent book event in Canada that you'd like to share with us? Submit them to the Quill & Quire Flickr pool and they'll show up here.

QUILLBLOG

Related posts