<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Best of lists take a beating &#8211; but what about critical honesty?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.quillandquire.com/blog/index.php/2009/11/06/best-of-lists-take-a-beating-but-what-about-critical-honesty/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.quillandquire.com/blog/index.php/2009/11/06/best-of-lists-take-a-beating-but-what-about-critical-honesty/</link>
	<description>Daily updates from the blog division of Quill &#38; Quire, Canada&#039;s magazine of book news and reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 21:31:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com" />
	<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://superfeedr.com/hubbub" />
		<item>
		<title>By: Lija</title>
		<link>http://www.quillandquire.com/blog/index.php/2009/11/06/best-of-lists-take-a-beating-but-what-about-critical-honesty/comment-page-1/#comment-193261</link>
		<dc:creator>Lija</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 17:58:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.quillandquire.com/blog/?p=5815#comment-193261</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think most people were really saying that women should be on that list just because – most of the criticism seems to stem from the belief that given the quality of writing from female writers (this year in particular!), PW&#039;s excuse was just weak.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think most people were really saying that women should be on that list just because – most of the criticism seems to stem from the belief that given the quality of writing from female writers (this year in particular!), PW&#8217;s excuse was just weak.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

