Comments on: Dan Brown, Simon Kernick, and the marketing fail that wasn’t (maybe) http://www.quillandquire.com/blog/index.php/2009/07/27/dan-brown-simon-kernick-and-the-marketing-fail-that-wasnt-maybe/ Daily updates from the blog division of Quill & Quire, Canada's magazine of book news and reviews Mon, 13 Feb 2012 21:31:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4 By: patricia http://www.quillandquire.com/blog/index.php/2009/07/27/dan-brown-simon-kernick-and-the-marketing-fail-that-wasnt-maybe/comment-page-1/#comment-191743 patricia Wed, 29 Jul 2009 03:35:42 +0000 http://www.quillandquire.com/blog/?p=4725#comment-191743 snort...spewing coffee out my nose... snort…spewing coffee out my nose…

]]> By: angel guerra http://www.quillandquire.com/blog/index.php/2009/07/27/dan-brown-simon-kernick-and-the-marketing-fail-that-wasnt-maybe/comment-page-1/#comment-191726 angel guerra Tue, 28 Jul 2009 12:50:23 +0000 http://www.quillandquire.com/blog/?p=4725#comment-191726 It's all okay because the author agrees with the publisher to mislead the public? To buy a book today you need to come armed with a Hemingway shit detector. It’s all okay because the author agrees with the publisher to mislead the public? To buy a book today you need to come armed with a Hemingway shit detector.

]]> By: Rob in Victoria http://www.quillandquire.com/blog/index.php/2009/07/27/dan-brown-simon-kernick-and-the-marketing-fail-that-wasnt-maybe/comment-page-1/#comment-191711 Rob in Victoria Mon, 27 Jul 2009 17:05:08 +0000 http://www.quillandquire.com/blog/?p=4725#comment-191711 "What was initially decried as the basest kind of deception was in fact a cross-promotion marketing scheme." You say that like the two terms are mutually exclusive... “What was initially decried as the basest kind of deception was in fact a cross-promotion marketing scheme.”

You say that like the two terms are mutually exclusive…

]]>