More than 150 publishers, authors, agents, and others filled a conference rooom at a Toronto hotel on Thursday to hear Access Copyright’s Roanie Levy break down the U.S. legal settlement between Google and publishers and authors.
The basic text of Levy’s presentation is available online here (downloadable via the link in the second-last paragraph), and the official site pertaining to the settlement is here. For any readers who have been following the issue only peripherally, here’s a recap of some of the main points and important dates.
- First, the settlement provides for a one-time payment to rightsholders (that is, authors and/or publishers) whose books have been digitized by Google without permission up to May 5 of this year. That digitization payment could range from the $60 minimum to $300, depending on how many claims are registered. Claims must be filed by January 5, 2010; that can be done here.
- Those who wish to opt out of the class action settlement – thereby preserving their right to sue Google themselves – must do so by May 5.
- Going forward, Google is hoping to, ah, monetize its online book holdings through online ads, institutional subscriptions (such as to libraries and schools), and single-digital-copy consumer sales. The plan calls for rightsholders to receive 63% of any such revenue, with Google keeping the rest.
- A third-party registry will be established to manage the flow of money and rights; such a group will function much as Access Copyright does in Canada.
- Rightsholders who are part of the settlement can opt to exclude specific books from Google’s online offerings, and can also set single-copy consumer prices themselves. Books that fall under the settlement must be excluded by April 5, 2011.
Note that these are the barest bones of a complicated agreement, and readers should check the links above for all the nuances and provisos. Levy, for her part, stressed that rightsholders whose books are affected should register a claim. “Nobody’s going to be out looking for you,” she warned, noting that Google’s class-action payment will be divided only among rightsholders who’ve filed a claim. “Google pays. The money’s just not going to end up in your pocket.”
“Nobody’s going to be out looking for you”
Not surprising, since Google’s attitude from the beginning has been that they can do whatever they like with other people’s intellectual property, without taking the time to ask permission. Levy manages to make it sound like it’s the author’s fault if Google copies and sells their work without obtaining permission and paying for it. This has been a test case of the preservation of authors’ rights in electronic media, and organizations like Access Copyright have failed abysmally in their responsibilities to defend those rights.
“Google pays. The money’s just not going to end up in your pocket.”
I bet there’s a lot of unintentional truth in that statement. The lawyers who negotiated this settlement will certainly end up with a lot more money in their pockets than any writer ever will.
The only way to avoid being forced to accept Google’s abuse of your copyright, and their ongoing exploitation of your work, is to opt out:
http://www.googlebooksettlement.com/r/enter_opt_out
[...] Quill & Quire has links and more detailed coverage. This was written by Jill Murray. Posted on Wednesday, February 25, 2009, at 5:58 pm. Filed under Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink. Follow comments here with the RSS feed. Post a comment or leave a trackback. [...]
[...] part of its class action settlement (which we blogged about last month), the Internet giant has earmarked $125 million for copyright holders – but since many of said [...]
[...] A more organized opposition to the Google Book Search settlement is beginning to emerge in advance of the fast-approaching May 5 opt-out deadline. (For more details on the settlement, see here.) [...]
[...] Google book search settlement (for background, see here and here) faces yet another hurdle. The New York Times is reporting today that the U.S. Justice [...]