The item beside this text is an advertisement


Filed under: AwardsIndustry news , ,

Related posts

Backroom Booker stories

This came out a month back, but we’ll highlight it once more anyway in case anyone missed it. The Guardian has talked to one member of each Booker jury for the past 40 years, asking for the scoop on how each shortlist and winner was decided. It’s funny and fascinating reading, and since hell will freeze over before we see similar candour from Giller jurors, this will have to satisfy us here in Canada.

Quillblog’s favourite story is the one Ion Trewin tells about the 1974 prize. Juror Elizabeth Jane Howard pushed hard to get Kingsley Amis’s Ending Up onto the shortlist. Trewin and A.S. Byatt, the third juror, agreed, but with some misgivings, since Howard was in fact married to Amis. When it came time to pick the winner, Trewin writes, Howard “remained keen on Ending Up, but realising that neither Antonia nor I would countenance it winning, she concentrated on Stanley Middleton’s Holiday, a study of middle England that she saw as a ‘perfect miniature.’” (Holiday ended up tying for the win with Nadine Gordimer’s The Conservationist.)

If one overall theme emerges, it’s that few jurors’ minds are changed in the deliberations. As James Wood (1994) puts it:

But the absurdity of the process was soon apparent: it is almost impossible to persuade someone else of the quality or poverty of a selected novel (a useful lesson in the limits of literary criticism). In practice, judge A blathers on about his favourite novel for five minutes, and then judge B blathers on about her favourite novel for five minutes, and nothing changes: no one switches sides. That is when the horse-trading begins.

Hilary Mantel (1990) came out of her own experience equally skeptical:

I’m glad I was a Booker judge relatively early in my career. It stopped me thinking that literary prizes are about literary value. Even the most correct jury goes in for horse-trading and gamesmanship, and what emerges is a compromise.

  • Rob in Victoria

    I’m shocked — SHOCKED — to learn that there is horse-trading and gamesmanship going on here!

  • angel guerra

    I can’t see M Atwood tolerating any horse-trading. Not on her watch by golly. The jurors will do exactly as they are told, right little Bobby.

The item directly under this text is an advertisement
Book Pictures

Do you have great photos from a recent book event in Canada that you'd like to share with us? Submit them to the Quill & Quire Flickr pool and they'll show up here.

Eva Stachniak's Empress of the Night

Eva Stachniak poses with a copy of her book, Empress of the Night

Tea and snacks inspired by Eva Stachniak's Empress of the Night

Rimma Burashko with author Eva Stachniak

Eva Stachniak talks to the audience about the best and worst of Catherine the Great's favourites

Eva Stachniak smiles as she signs a copy of Empress of the Night for a fan

Fans wait in line to have their copies of Empress of the Night signed by Eva Stachniak

Fans wait in line to have their copies of Empress of the Night signed by Eva Stachniak

Lesley Strutt, Dean Steadman, Amanda Earl, Alastair Larwill and Frances Boyle

Frances Boyle, Dean Steadman, Lesley Strutt and Alastair Larwill

Amanda Earl

Jewel of the Thames launch

The item directly under this text is an advertisement

Recent comments