<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Two takes on censorship</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.quillandquire.com/blog/index.php/2008/09/19/two-takes-on-censorship/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.quillandquire.com/blog/index.php/2008/09/19/two-takes-on-censorship/</link>
	<description>Daily updates from the blog division of Quill &#38; Quire, Canada&#039;s magazine of book news and reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 21:47:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com" />
	<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://superfeedr.com/hubbub" />
		<item>
		<title>By: Dan Dickinson</title>
		<link>http://www.quillandquire.com/blog/index.php/2008/09/19/two-takes-on-censorship/comment-page-1/#comment-132964</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Dickinson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Sep 2008 14:29:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.quillandquire.com/blog/index.php/2008/09/19/two-takes-on-censorship/#comment-132964</guid>
		<description>Circle your calendars. The National Post backed grassroots activism over crass commercialism.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Circle your calendars. The National Post backed grassroots activism over crass commercialism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://www.quillandquire.com/blog/index.php/2008/09/19/two-takes-on-censorship/comment-page-1/#comment-132516</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 23:38:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.quillandquire.com/blog/index.php/2008/09/19/two-takes-on-censorship/#comment-132516</guid>
		<description>Have you ever read a Bratz book?  How do you know they are designed to encourage &quot;reluctant readers&quot;?  Have you seen any studies that reading Bratz books leads &quot;reluctant readers&quot; to go to read other books?  Maybe these books are just designed to promote the Bratz brand.

Why should Scholastic be allowed to promote a line of dolls in schools?  Do we let Toys-R-Us come into schools and sell dolls?

And finally, what makes you so sure that a much larger group wants Scholastic to promote the Bratz in schools?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you ever read a Bratz book?  How do you know they are designed to encourage &#8220;reluctant readers&#8221;?  Have you seen any studies that reading Bratz books leads &#8220;reluctant readers&#8221; to go to read other books?  Maybe these books are just designed to promote the Bratz brand.</p>
<p>Why should Scholastic be allowed to promote a line of dolls in schools?  Do we let Toys-R-Us come into schools and sell dolls?</p>
<p>And finally, what makes you so sure that a much larger group wants Scholastic to promote the Bratz in schools?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

