The item directly under this text is an advertisement

Opinion, , , ,

A call to blog

Every author with even an ounce of self-promotional instinct seems to have a blog these days, but how many editors and publishers do? According to Booksquare blogger Kassia Kroszer, the whole publishing industry needs to step up in this department if they truly want to see their authors’ works succeed.

Just as authors need to better market themselves and their books, so do publishers. While the audience for a publisher website is diverse — authors, booksellers, journalists, agents, readers, and more — talking about books on your website the same way you talk about books in your catalog simply isn’t cutting it. In printed material, you have various constraints. On the web, you have the ability to do something special: tell the world what excites you, the publisher, about a particular book. [...] If “blogging” can help you throw off the corporate chains and lead to a more natural, casual, exciting discussion about your books, then call it blogging.

Kroszer’s suggestion is certainly food for thought, but we can’t help thinking it’s maybe a little too Utopian. If we can assume, for a moment, that most publishers and editors routinely have to publish works they don’t personally care that much for, how can we expect them to muster blogger-style enthusiasm? That’s why dull catalogue copy was invented – it’s a passive, neutral voice that can be applied equally to works that editors truly love and to works that they are simply publishing to make money. And if an editor was to go on at bubbly length about a new Atwood title, say, but then stay curiously silent about the new Ondaatje, we would all suspect they hated the Ondaatje. Indeed, Kroszer practically acknowledges this herself:

Publishers, for reasons known only to them, are bizarrely hands-off when it comes to talking about their products. Sure, you get the occasional enthusiastic comment at a conference or during an interview, but the approach is more “we love all our children equally”… so we won’t talk about any of them.

Sadly, if you ask us, that’s the way it’s always been, and that’s probably the way it’ll always be.

(Thanks to Galleycat for the link.)

Related posts:

  1. » Korean-based Canadian starts new publishing blog
  2. » Saturday Night’s last call
  3. » Bad times for literary fiction
  4. » Snakes on our blog
  5. » How to get ahead in publishing

2 Responses to “A call to blog”

  1. looksforbooks says:

    I’ve always thought Raincoast does a good job at blogs:
    http://blogs.raincoast.com/

  2. PGB says:

    No worries over at the S&S blog about loving the children unequally.

    http://canada.simonsaysblogs.com/

Have your say:

The item directly under this text is an advertisement

Latest comments

  • Stuart Ross: Dangling modifier in the last sentence of the article. Stu
  • jrock: Von, if I were defining “frivolous” or “inane” I could use your comment as an example.
  • Von: Well, that just goes to show how frivolous Ayn Rand was–her musings or writings must be equally inane.
  • Marcel Ouellette: Please note that Claude Lebouthillier is not from Quebec, but from New Brunswick. Being Francophone...
  • Hart Hanson: I am one of the hundreds of writers who has benefited from Jack Hodgins’ work and his teachings...

Book Pictures

View all photos

Audio Interview with Zoe Heller, by Nigel Beale

Anansi Girls

Anansi Girls

David McGimpsey

Patrick Warner

Karen Solie

Charlie Huisken

Matthew Tierney and Charmaine

Michael Winter and Lisa Moore

Karen Solie and Lynn Henry

Search Quillblog

Quillblog Archives