The item directly under this text is an advertisement

Industry news, ,

Anansi kicked off Facebook

As has been covered exhaustively in Q&Q and elsewhere, publishers have been spending a lot of time of late trying to make use of the promotional possibilities of Web 2.0 phenomena like YouTube, Facebook, and Myspace.

There are rules, however, as House of Anansi Press discovered when its Facebook profile was deleted without notice. Their crime? Facebook demands that each profile correspond to an actual person, and Anansi is, well, not a person. (Neither are some of the fictional characters who have created their own profiles on the site – such as a couple from Todd Babiak’s newest novel – but that’s another matter.)

Think of it like zoning: you can’t live in a mall, and – theoretically, at least – you can’t open a store in your living room.

In response, Anansi’s online content developer, Julie Wilson, has posted an “address to Facebook” on YouTube.

You can watch it below:

(hat tip: That Shakespeherian Rag)

Related posts:

  1. » Babiak’s Champion City
  2. » Todd Babiak vs. toddbabiak.com
  3. » Anansi makes nice with booksellers
  4. » Anansi and Shortcovers team up to give away digital book
  5. » Riding the “Magic Bus” with the Anansi Girls

5 Responses to “Anansi kicked off Facebook”

  1. Steven W. Beattie says:

    It should be noted that Anansi hasn’t been kicked off Facebook entirely: they still maintain the groups House of Anansi Press and the Anansi Review Crew. It’s just their personal profile that was removed.

  2. Ingrid says:

    Within a few days they were back up, this time as part of the new Facebook profile listings now available to products or businesses.

  3. National Post says:

    [...] Now Facebook is removing profiles of small Canadian publishers, reports Quill & Quire on its Quillblog. House of Anansi, the Toronto-based publisher of books such as Lisa Moore’s Alligator and Ronald [...]

  4. Julie Wilson says:

    From The National Post:

    “Sounds like she still needs some instruction on the whole person versus non-person distinction. ”

    People play by different rules in the online world. Facebook surely knows that. And they let us kick around for so long, I’d suspect, with utter glee because we used that space extremely well. They learn from this lack of distinction. Keeps them flexible. In this instance, subversion was fun, fun, fun. Perhaps even better than “Cats.”

  5. corky st. claire says:

    fun, i suppose, but subversive? it’s about as subversive as when doug pepper waxed all excited about the tattoo on one of M&S’s newly signed scribblers.

Have your say:

The item directly under this text is an advertisement

Latest comments

  • Stuart Ross: Dangling modifier in the last sentence of the article. Stu
  • jrock: Von, if I were defining “frivolous” or “inane” I could use your comment as an example.
  • Von: Well, that just goes to show how frivolous Ayn Rand was–her musings or writings must be equally inane.
  • Marcel Ouellette: Please note that Claude Lebouthillier is not from Quebec, but from New Brunswick. Being Francophone...
  • Hart Hanson: I am one of the hundreds of writers who has benefited from Jack Hodgins’ work and his teachings...

Book Pictures

View all photos

Audio Interview with Zoe Heller, by Nigel Beale

Anansi Girls

Anansi Girls

David McGimpsey

Patrick Warner

Karen Solie

Charlie Huisken

Matthew Tierney and Charmaine

Michael Winter and Lisa Moore

Karen Solie and Lynn Henry

Search Quillblog

Quillblog Archives