The item beside this text is an advertisement

QUILLBLOG

Related posts

No related posts.

Can’t we all just get along?

In yet another attempt by a book reviewer to bring some light to her shadowy and sinister vocation, critic Erica Wagner writes in the Times Online of being asked, while speaking to a group of students, that primary question: “How do you tell a book is good?”

In lieu of an answer, Wagner cites the example of Philip Roth’s newest novel, Everyman. While she, along with The Times‘s Douglas Kennedy, found the novel to be brilliant, The New York Times‘s Michiko Kakutani thought the thing was a load of self-indulgent, whiny crap.

“So — who’s right?” Wagner asks. “Somebody’s got to be the decider, right? Right. But here’s the beauty of it. What’s ‘good’ for Kennedy is clearly not ‘good’ for Kakutani.” Reviewers are at the mercy of their emotional responses, she says, so readers should read reviews to be made “curious, not convinced.”

We at In Other Media think that’s a bit of a dodge. But that’s just our opinion!

Related links:
Read Erica Wagner’s piece in the Times Online

Comments are closed.

The item directly under this text is an advertisement
Books of the year
Click to see Books of the Year 2011 package Click to see Books of the Year 2010 package Click to see Books of the Year 2009 package
Most shared stories this week
Book Pictures

Do you have great photos from a recent book event in Canada that you'd like to share with us? Submit them to the Quill & Quire Flickr pool and they'll show up here.

a congrats to all

Rage

Jenna Tenn-Yuk

breaktime interviewing

interviewing

Danielle K.L. Gregoire

Sepideh

Elle P

sound poetry

Anita

Frances

winning

Recent comments